Peaslee v. Dudley

Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Peaslee v. Dudley, 63 N.H. 220 (N.H. 1884)
Carpenter, Stanley

Peaslee v. Dudley

Opinion of the Court

Carpenter, J.

The question presented is of no practical importance. Time spent in considering it would be wasted. If upon examination it should be found that the action in its present form cannot be maintained, the plaintiff would be permitted to amend by filing r count in assumpsit. The facts upon which the rights *221 of the parties depend having been fully tried and determined, there is no occasion for a further trial. The plaintiff may amend by adding a count for money paid (McDuffee v. Railroad, 52 N. H. 459, Buckminster v. Wright, 59 N. H. 153, and Merrill v. Perkins, 59 N. H. 343), and thereupon there will be

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
Peaslee v. Dudley.
Cited By
8 cases
Status
Published