Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1886

Watkins v. Arms

Watkins v. Arms
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Decided June 5, 1886 · Carpenter, Allen
6 A. 92; 64 N.H. 99

Watkins v. Arms

Opinion of the Court

Carpenter, J.

The plaintiff’s rights are not affected by the insolvency proceedings in Vermont. Perley v. Mason, 64 N. H. 6 ; Carbee v. Mason, 64 N. H. 10, and cases cited.

The conveyance of the land and bank stock to the defendant was absolute in terms, but was in fact a mere security. Watkins, upon payment of the mortgage debt was entitled to a reconveyance. This is a secret trust, and fraudulent in law, though no fraud was in fact intended. Stratton v. Putney, 63 N. H. 577, and cases cited.

Decree for the plaintiff.

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.