Watkins v. Arms
Watkins v. Arms
6 A. 92; 64 N.H. 99
Watkins v. Arms
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff’s rights are not affected by the insolvency proceedings in Vermont. Perley v. Mason, 64 N. H. 6 ; Carbee v. Mason, 64 N. H. 10, and cases cited.
The conveyance of the land and bank stock to the defendant was absolute in terms, but was in fact a mere security. Watkins, upon payment of the mortgage debt was entitled to a reconveyance. This is a secret trust, and fraudulent in law, though no fraud was in fact intended. Stratton v. Putney, 63 N. H. 577, and cases cited.
Decree for the plaintiff.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.