Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1886

Loverin v. School-District No. 3, Croydon

Loverin v. School-District No. 3, Croydon
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Decided June 5, 1886 · Doe, Clark
6 A. 35; 64 N.H. 102

Loverin v. School-District No. 3, Croydon

Opinion of the Court

Doe, C. J.

Since the trial, district No. 3 has been abolished by c. 43, Laws 1885. The town district, being now the defendant in interest on the question of school-house location, should be made a defendant of record, and should have notice and an opportunity to be heard. The plaintiffs may move at the trial term for an amendment and notice; and the case is continued.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.