Balcom v. McQuesten

Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Balcom v. McQuesten, 17 A. 638 (N.H. 1888)
65 N.H. 81
Blodgett, Smith

Balcom v. McQuesten

Opinion of the Court

Blodgett, J.

The second and third counts in the plaintiff’s declaration stating no cause of action, the demurrer to them was rightly sustained; and as the plaintiff’s unexecuted license from Fletcher constitutes his only title to the ice cut, carried away, and converted to their own use by the defendants, no recovery can be had under the first count, for want of title. Licenses do not pass aby title until they are executed or enjoyed, and then only to the extent to which they are executed or enjoyed.

Judgment for the defendants,.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
Balcom v. McQuesten & A.
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published