Monroe v. Connecticut River Lumber Co.
Monroe v. Connecticut River Lumber Co.
32 A. 152; 66 N.H. 628
Monroe v. Connecticut River Lumber Co.
Opinion of the Court
The question of fact, whether Van Dyke was made a party for the sole purpose of preventing a removal of the action, etc., can finally be determined only by the federal court. Burlington, &c., Railway Co. v. Dunn, 122 U. S. 513. Whether it is or is not expedient to try the question here is a question of fact for the trial term.
Case discharged.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.