Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1893

Brown v. Drew

Brown v. Drew
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Decided December 5, 1893 · Carpenter
42 A. 177; 67 N.H. 569

Brown v. Drew

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. *

“ No action shall be maintained upon a contract for the sale of land, unless the agreement upon which it is brought, or some memorandum thereof, is in writing, and signed by the party to be charged, or by some person by him thereto authorized by writing.” P. S., e. 215, 8. 1. Part performance of a contract for the sale of land, as when the purchaser takes possession of the land or makes substantial improvements upon it before the delivery of the deed, is held in equity sufficient to relieve him from the operation of the statute; but merely the payment of the agreed price does not have that effect. Ham v. Goodrich, 33 N. H. 32, 36-39; Kidder v. Barr, 35 N. H. 235, 255; Purcell v. Mines, 4 Wall. 513, 518; 3 Pom. Eq. Jur., s. 1409, note.

Bill dismissed.

Carpenter, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

See foot-note on page 80.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.