Gurnsey v. Keene

Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Gurnsey v. Keene, 34 A. 742 (N.H. 1894)
68 N.H. 243
Carpenter

Gurnsey v. Keene

Opinion of the Court

Carpenter, J.

“If no sufficient objection is made, all petitions relating to highways shall be referred to the county commissioners.” P. S., e. 68, s. 5. If, upon- a trial of the issue raised by the answer, it should be found that the new highway is laid over an old one, the finding would be a sufficient objection to sending the petition to the commissioners. The plaintiffs would be entitled to no damages (Fierce v. Somersworth, 10 N. H. 369), and their petition would be dismissed. If it should be found that there was no existing highway where the new one is laid, the petition must be referred to the commissioners. On the return of their report the plaintiffs would be entitled to, and in order to-obtain their rights might be obliged to have, another trial. P. S., c. 68, s. 10. They might thus be subjected to the expense and delay of two trials where one would suffice. What method of procedure in the trial of the several issues presented will be most convenient, expeditious, and least expensive to the parties, is á question of fact to be determined at the trial term. Owen v. ' Weston, 63 N. H. 599.

Case discharged.

All concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
Gurnsey & A., Ap’ts, v. Keene
Status
Published