Jackson v. Higgins

Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Jackson v. Higgins, 49 A. 574 (N.H. 1900)
70 N.H. 637
Young, Paksons

Jackson v. Higgins

Opinion of the Court

Young, J.

The first exception raises no question of law. Whether there is any evidence, is a question of law; but whether it is sufficient, is a question of fact.

The statute of frauds does not apply to contracts of hiring which may be performed within one year.

The letter was clearly admissible.

Exceptions overruled.

Paksons, Jā€ž did not sit: the others concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
Jackson v. Higgins.
Status
Published