Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1900

Concord Land & Water Power Co. v. Clough

Concord Land & Water Power Co. v. Clough
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Decided June 5, 1900 · Peaslee, Chase, Pike
47 A. 704; 70 N.H. 627

Counsel

Streeter, Walker & Hollis and Sargent & Niles, for the plaintiffs., Martin & Howe, for the defendant.

Concord Land & Water Power Co. v. Clough

Opinion of the Court

Peaslee, J.

The plaintiffs’ comment on the defendant’s failure to show the nature of the soil by inspection was an argument concerning the failure to pr.oduce available evidence, and was unobjectionable (Mitchell v. Railroad, 68 N. H. 96, 116); while the defendant’s unsworn statement of the reason why such evidence was not produced vitiates the verdict. Bullard v. Railroad, 64 N. H. 27.

Verdict set aside.

Chase and Pike, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.