Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1900

White v. Dakin

White v. Dakin
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Decided June 5, 1900 · Peaslee, Young
47 A. 611; 70 N.H. 632

White v. Dakin

Opinion of the Court

Peaslee, J.

There was no evidence to justify a finding of fraud. Such a conclusión would have been mere conjecture. Deschenes v. Railroad, 69 N. H. 285, 288, et seq.

*633 The testimony of the creditor was properly excluded. Although not a party of record, he was directly interested in the result of the appeal. Foster v. Ela, 69 N. H. 460.

FJxceptions overruled.

Young, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.