Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1902

Driscoll v. Portsmouth, Kittery & York Street Railway

Driscoll v. Portsmouth, Kittery & York Street Railway
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Decided March 7, 1902 · Chase
51 A. 904; 71 N.H. 619; 1902 N.H. LEXIS 93

Counsel

John W. Kelley, for the plaintiff. Samuel W. Emery, for the defendants.

Driscoll v. Portsmouth, Kittery & York Street Railway

Opinion of the Court

Chase, J.

The defendants do not contend that the courts of this state cannot entertain jurisdiction of the action, but say it is within their discretion whether they will do so or not. If so, the question is one of fact rather than of law, and should be decided in the superior court.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.