Melvin v. Melvin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Melvin v. Melvin, 58 A. 835 (N.H. 1904)
73 N.H. 602; 1904 N.H. LEXIS 28
Parsons, Young

Melvin v. Melvin

Opinion of the Court

Parsons, C. J.

Whether sufficient cause appears in any ease to require that an action should be brought forward and the judgment vacated, is a question of fact.

*603 The evidentiary facts stated are not necessarily inconsistent with a finding that justice did not require such action in this case; consequently the dismissal of the motion presents no error of law. Fulton Pulley Co. v. Company, 71 N. H. 384; Reed v. Prescott, 70 N. H. 88; Clough v. Moore, 63 N. H. 111, 113; Warner Bank v. Clement, 58 N. H. 533.

Exception overruled.

Young, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
Melvin v. Melvin.
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published