Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1904

Melvin v. Melvin

Melvin v. Melvin
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Decided July 2, 1904 · Parsons, Young
58 A. 835; 73 N.H. 602; 1904 N.H. LEXIS 28

Melvin v. Melvin

Opinion of the Court

Parsons, C. J.

Whether sufficient cause appears in any ease to require that an action should be brought forward and the judgment vacated, is a question of fact.

*603 The evidentiary facts stated are not necessarily inconsistent with a finding that justice did not require such action in this case; consequently the dismissal of the motion presents no error of law. Fulton Pulley Co. v. Company, 71 N. H. 384; Reed v. Prescott, 70 N. H. 88; Clough v. Moore, 63 N. H. 111, 113; Warner Bank v. Clement, 58 N. H. 533.

Exception overruled.

Young, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.