Melvin v. Melvin
Melvin v. Melvin
58 A. 835; 73 N.H. 602; 1904 N.H. LEXIS 28
Melvin v. Melvin
Opinion of the Court
Whether sufficient cause appears in any ease to require that an action should be brought forward and the judgment vacated, is a question of fact.
*603 The evidentiary facts stated are not necessarily inconsistent with a finding that justice did not require such action in this case; consequently the dismissal of the motion presents no error of law. Fulton Pulley Co. v. Company, 71 N. H. 384; Reed v. Prescott, 70 N. H. 88; Clough v. Moore, 63 N. H. 111, 113; Warner Bank v. Clement, 58 N. H. 533.
Exception overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.