Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1906

State v. Frazier

State v. Frazier
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Decided December 4, 1906 · Chase
65 A. 297; 74 N.H. 112; 1906 N.H. LEXIS 76

Counsel

Orville E. Cain, solicitor, for the state. Joseph Madden, for the defendant.

State v. Frazier

Opinion of the Court

Chase, J.

The defendant’s exceptions are to decisions of the superior court upon questions of fact, and raise no questions of law. Dearborn, v. Newhall, 63 N. H. 301. The case differs from Winstow v. Smith, ante, 65, in that the court exercised his discretion, and, so far as appears, properly. It cannot be held as matter of law that the testimony contained in the affidavit submitted to the court outweighed all the other testimony that was before him, especially in view of its indefiniteness and the manner in which it was obtained.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.