Dresser v. Hopkinton

Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Dresser v. Hopkinton, 71 A. 534 (N.H. 1908)
75 N.H. 138; 1908 N.H. LEXIS 57
Bingham

Dresser v. Hopkinton

Opinion of the Court

Bingham, J.

As a rule, personal property is taxable in the town in which the owner resides. P. S., c. 56, s. 1; Kent v. Exeter, 68 N. H. 469. There are, however, exceptions to this rule (P. S., c. 56, ss. 10, 12, 16, 18; Laws 1905, c. 15; Conn. River Lumber Co. v. Columbia, 62 N. H. 286; Coe v. Errol, 62 N. H. 803; Winkley v. Newton, 67 N. H. 80; Winnipiseogee Paper Co. v. Northfield, 67 N. H. 365; Conn. Valley Lumber Co. v. Monroe, 71 N. H. 473); but no provision of law making an exception of the class of property here in question has been pointed out, and an examination of the statutes has disclosed none. The abatement was properly granted.

¡Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
Dresser v. Hopkinton.
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published