Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1909

Hobbs v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Decided February 2, 1909 · Peaslee

72 A. 290; 75 N.H. 590; 1909 N.H. LEXIS 71

Counsel

Walter D. H. Hill and Arthur L. Foote, for the plaintiff. Leslie P. Snow, for the defendants.

Opinion of the Court

Peaslee, J.

The evidence was admissible. The location of points which were at a known distance from the one in dispute would furnish some information upon the issue being tried. Keefe v. Railroad, ante, 116.

*591 The argument was manifestly proper. It was confined to the evidence in the case and was a temperate criticism of the devious, course which the evidence tended to show the plaintiff had taken.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.