Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1912

Perham v. Lane

Perham v. Lane
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Decided June 4, 1912 · Peaslee
83 A. 805; 76 N.H. 580; 1912 N.H. LEXIS 98

Perham v. Lane

Opinion of the Court

Peaslee, J.

The defendant's counsel has not furnished a brief, and no debatable question has been found in the case. The evidence, instead of being conclusive in favor of the defendant, was conclusive against her. State v. Harrington, 69 N. H. 496. The *581 former bill was for an earlier default and not for those relied upon here. In such a case the doctrine that a second suit must abate has no application.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.