Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1932

Cobleigh v. Spring

Cobleigh v. Spring
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Decided January 5, 1932 · Per Curiam.
157 A. 886; 85 N.H. 560; 1932 N.H. LEXIS 128

Cobleigh v. Spring

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The bill cannot be maintained. It is the duty of the probate court to make the decree of distribution. P. L., c. 307, s. 6. The superior court cannot interfere with the exercise of that jurisdiction. Rockwell v. Dow, ante, 58 and cases cited. The decree of the probate court will fully protect the plaintiff, and consequently he cannot invoke the direction of the superior court.

Demurrer sustained.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.