Athanasiou v. Roftsias

Supreme Court of New Hampshire June 29, 1933

Athanasiou v. Roftsias, 167 A. 265 (N.H. 1933)

86 N.H. 595; 1933 N.H. LEXIS 89

Woodbury

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

If the excluded evidence was relevant, it was within the trial court’s discretion to exclude it for remoteness. As the exclusion may have been for this reason, the exception, being general, presents no legal question. Boulanger v. McQuesten, 79 N. H. 175, 176.

The case shows evidence warranting the argument excepted to.

Judgments on the verdicts.

Woodbury, J., did not sit.

Reference

Full Case Name: Olympia Athanasiou v. Nicholas Roftsias. Nicholas Roftsias v. Olympia Athanasiou.
Status: Published