George v. Morse & Malloy Shoe Co.
George v. Morse & Malloy Shoe Co.
170 A. 776; 86 N.H. 596; 1934 N.H. LEXIS 104
George v. Morse & Malloy Shoe Co.
Concurring Opinion
I concur in the result upon the ground that the injury was foreseen, anticipated and not accidental. In so far as the doctrine upon which this case is disposed of is concerned I dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in Thomson v. Company.
Opinion of the Court
The case is governed by Thomson v. Company, ante, 436, decided this day.
In so far as the facts differ from those in the earlier case, they are not more favorable to the plaintiff.
Exception overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.