Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1937

Salem v. Sperber

Salem v. Sperber
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Decided February 2, 1937 · Per Curiam.
189 A. 865; 88 N.H. 374; 1937 N.H. LEXIS 56

Salem v. Sperber

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The statute (P. L., c. 66, s. 25) requires the purchaser of real estate sold by a tax collector to give notice to mortgagees within thirty days from the sale, and the sale “shall be void as against any mortgagee to whom such notice” is not given. The requirement of notice within the time specified is a material condition “because the statute makes it so.” Derry Bank v. Griffin, 68 N. H. 183, 184. The principle that in all cases of sales of real estate for non-payment of taxes “every prerequisite to the exercise of the power must precede its exercise” (Cahoon v. Coe, 57 N. H. 556, 569) extends to matters to be performed in order that a sale include a mortgage interest, and the statutory regulations are fixed and rigid.

Decree for defendant.

Page, J., was absent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.