Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1949

Potter v. Lefebvre

Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Decided June 7, 1949 · PER CURIAM.

66 A.2d 643; 95 N.H. 482; 1949 N.H. LEXIS 201 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Karl E. Dowd for the plaintiff filed no brief. George R. Scammon and Lindsey R. Brigham (Mr. Brigham orally), for the defendant.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The ruling of the Trial Court was correct. The law upon this point is correctly stated in the Restatement, Conflict of Laws, s. 603, as follows: “If action is barred by the statute of limitations of the forum, no action can be maintained though action is not barred in the state where the cause of action arose.” See also, Connecticut &c. Co. v. Railroad, 78 N. H. 553, 555. The order, therefore, is

Exceptions overruled.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.