THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

SUPREME COURT

In Case No. 2014-0701, In the Matter of Anders Hogblom and Jacqueline Hogblom, the court on July 16, 2015, issued the following order:

Having considered the briefs and record submitted on appeal, we conclude that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. See Sup. Ct. R. 18(1). We affirm.

The petitioner, Anders Hogblom, appeals a final decree by the Circuit Court (Leonard, J.) in his divorce from the respondent, Jacqueline Hogblom. He contends that the trial court erred by: (1) denying his request to annul the parties’ eight-year marriage; (2) awarding the respondent approximately 7.8% of the net marital assets, see RSA 458:16-a (2004); and (3) awarding the respondent alimony of $2,200 a month for five years, see RSA 458:19 (Supp. 2014).

As the appealing party, the petitioner has the burden of demonstrating reversible error. Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014). Based upon our review of the trial court’s well-reasoned order, the petitioner’s challenges to it, the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that the petitioner has not demonstrated reversible error. See id.

Affirmed.

Dalianis, C.J., and Hicks, Conboy, Lynn, and Bassett, JJ., concurred.

Eileen Fox, Clerk