THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

SUPREME COURT

In Case No. 2019-0127, Mike Puiia v. Sarah Miner & a., the court on September 26, 2019, issued the following order:

Having considered the brief, the memoranda of law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. See Sup. Ct. R. 18(1). We affirm.

The plaintiff, Mike Puiia, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Howard, J.) dismissing his complaints against the defendants, Sarah Miner, Elizabeth Ann Marcotte, Lea Gardner-Elkin, Amy Coombs, and Whole Life Health Care. We construe his brief to contend that the trial court erred by: (1) not finding that allegedly delayed and incomplete discovery in a collateral family division matter tolled the statute of limitations on his tort claims here; (2) not finding that his amended complaint against Miner adequately specified her allegedly tortious statements and acts; (3) finding that Coombs, Gardner-Elkin, and Marcotte were immune from liability under RSA 169-C:31 (2014); (4) not waiving “some procedural rules” because the collateral case was “enormous, complicated and highly-atypical”; (5) not maintaining documents from the collateral matter under seal; and (6) finding his pleadings moot after granting the defendants’ motions to dismiss.

As the appealing party, the plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating reversible error. Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014). Based upon our review of the trial court’s well-reasoned order, the plaintiff’s challenges to it, the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that the plaintiff has not demonstrated reversible error. See id.

Affirmed.

Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.

Eileen Fox, Clerk