THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

In Case No. 2020-0297, Baboucar Taal v. St. Mary's Bank; Baboucar Taal v. Niederman, Stanzel and Lindsey & a., the court on April 1, 2021, issued the following order: On June 22, 2020, the plaintiff, Baboucar Taal, filed a notice of appeal listing two superior court cases: Baboucar Taal v. St. Mary’s Bank, No. 216- 2011-CV-00741, and Baboucar Taal v. Niederman Stanzel & Lindsey, PLLC & a., No. 216-2011-CV-00742. On June 29, 2020, and again on September 2, 2020, the plaintiff was ordered to “file a copy of the decision below, the clerk’s written notice of the decision below, any order disposing of a timely-filed post-trial motion, and the clerk’s written notice of any order disposing of a timely-filed post-trial motion.” See Rule 7(6). The plaintiff only partially complied with this order, however. Because the plaintiff has failed to file with this court a copy of the trial court decision in Baboucar Taal v. Niederman Stanzel & Lindsey, PLLC & a., No. 216-2011-CV-00742 that he intends to appeal, his appeal as it relates to that case is hereby dismissed.

As to Baboucar Taal v. St. Mary’s Bank, No. 216-2011-CV-00741, having considered the briefs and record submitted on appeal, the court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary in this case, see Sup. Ct. R. 18(1), and that the appealing party, the plaintiff, has not established reversible error, see Sup. Ct. R. 25(8); see also Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014).

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.

Timothy A. Gudas, Clerk