Katherine Spaulding v. Harold Ekstrom
Katherine Spaulding v. Harold Ekstrom
Katherine Spaulding v. Harold Ekstrom
Opinion
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2021-0557, Katherine Spaulding v. Harold Ekstrom, the court on October 17, 2022, issued the following order: Having considered the briefs filed by the plaintiff, Katherine Spaulding, the memorandum of law filed by the defendant, Harold Ekstrom, and the record submitted on appeal, the court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary in this case, see Sup. Ct. R. 18(1), and that the plaintiff, as the appealing party, has not established reversible error, see Sup. Ct. R. 25(8); Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014).
Affirmed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.