State of New Hampshire v. Jon Cline
State of New Hampshire v. Jon Cline
Opinion
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2021-0575, State of New Hampshire v. Jon Cline, the court on August 11, 2022, issued the following order: Having considered the defendant’s brief, the State’s memorandum of law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. See Sup. Ct. R. 18(1). The defendant, Jon Cline, appeals his conviction, following a bench trial in the Circuit Court (Boyle, J.), on a charge of harassment. See RSA 644:4 (Supp. 2021). He argues that the evidence was insufficient, as a matter of law, to support his conviction. The State agrees. Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s conviction.
Reversed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.