Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division, 1951

Kurowski v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bayonne

Kurowski v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bayonne
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Decided January 17, 1951 · Judges Freund, Proctor and Rogers
78 A.2d 429; 11 N.J. Super. 433 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Kurowski v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bayonne

Opinion

11 N.J. Super. 433 (1951)
78 A.2d 429

CASIMIR KUROWSKI AND LUCILLE KUROWSKI, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, A CORPORATE BODY, AND MORRIS PADWE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 2, 1951.
Decided January 17, 1951.

*444 Before Judges FREUND, PROCTOR and ROGERS.

Mr. Stephen P. Piga argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Mr. William Rubin argued the cause for the defendant-respondent Board of Adjustment of the City of Bayonne.

Mr. A. Alfred Fink, attorney for defendant-respondent Morris Padwe.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Brennan in the court below.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑