Sexton v. Essex County Ritualarium
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Sexton v. Essex County Ritualarium, 91 A.2d 162 (1952)
21 N.J. Super. 329
Judges Jayne, Proctor, and Schettino
Sexton v. Essex County Ritualarium
Opinion
ISAAC JOSEPH SEXTON, PHILIP BLUME, ISIDORE MILLER, JOSEPH MILLER, LOUIS HEYMAN, DEBORAH RUBIN, VICTOR R. LEVEY, MARY B. LEVEY, HIS WIFE, FRED N. NICOLACOPULOS AND ANNA GRANT, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
ESSEX COUNTY RITUALARIUM, AN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION, AND ESSEX COUNTY RITUALARIUM SYNAGOGUE, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges JAYNE, PROCTOR, and SCHETTINO.
Mr. Harry Green argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Hodes & Hodes, attorneys; Mr. William Hodes).
Mr. Bernard Freedman argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Koehler, Augenblick & Freedman, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Ewart in Sexton v. Bates, 17 N.J. Super. 246 (Law Div. 1951).
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published