Haytko v. William Crabb & Co.
Haytko v. William Crabb & Co.
91 A.2d 231; 21 N.J. Super. 330
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Haytko v. William Crabb & Co.
Opinion
WILLIAM HAYTKO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIAM CRABB AND CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges JAYNE, PROCTOR, and SCHETTINO.
Mr. Marshall Crowley argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Toner, Crowley & Ackerman, attorneys; Mr. Robert A. Vanderbilt, on the brief).
Mr. Harry Cohn argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
We concur in the conclusion expressed by Judge Francis and reported in 17 N.J. Super. 95 (Co. Ct., Law Div., 1951).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.