Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division, 1952

DeMarco v. Estlow

DeMarco v. Estlow
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Decided September 22, 1952 · Judges McGeehan, Bigelow and Smalley
91 A.2d 272; 21 N.J. Super. 356 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

DeMarco v. Estlow

Opinion

21 N.J. Super. 356 (1952)
91 A.2d 272

ANTHONY R. DeMARCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
FRANCIS ESTLOW, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 15, 1952.
Decided September 22, 1952.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, BIGELOW and SMALLEY.

Mr. James D. Stockwell argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Bleakly, Stockwell & Zink, attorneys).

Mr. James M. Davis, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Haneman in his opinion filed in the Chancery Division and reported in 18 N.J. Super. 30.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑