LeFelt v. Nasarow
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
LeFelt v. Nasarow, 185 A.2d 217 (1962)
76 N.J. Super. 576
Judges Conford, Gaulkin and Kilkenny
LeFelt v. Nasarow
Opinion
FLORENCE LeFELT AND REUBEN LeFELT, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
WASILI NASAROW, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.
Mr. Samuel Doan argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Stalter, Doan & DeYoe, attorneys for appellant Aetna Insurance Company; Mr. James H. McLeod, attorney for appellant The Phoenix Insurance Company; Mr. Aaron Dines, on the brief).
Mr. Archie Elkins argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Robert A. Elkins, on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Kolovsky in the Law Division. LeFelt v. Nasarow, 71 N.J. Super. 538 (Law Div. 1962).
Reference
- Cited By
- 6 cases
- Status
- Published