Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division, 1962

LeFelt v. Nasarow

LeFelt v. Nasarow
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Decided October 29, 1962 · Judges Conford, Gaulkin and Kilkenny
185 A.2d 217; 76 N.J. Super. 576 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

LeFelt v. Nasarow

Opinion

76 N.J. Super. 576 (1962)
185 A.2d 217

FLORENCE LeFELT AND REUBEN LeFELT, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
WASILI NASAROW, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 22, 1962.
Decided October 29, 1962.

Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.

Mr. Samuel Doan argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Stalter, Doan & DeYoe, attorneys for appellant Aetna Insurance Company; Mr. James H. McLeod, attorney for appellant The Phoenix Insurance Company; Mr. Aaron Dines, on the brief).

Mr. Archie Elkins argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Robert A. Elkins, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Kolovsky in the Law Division. LeFelt v. Nasarow, 71 N.J. Super. 538 (Law Div. 1962).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑