New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division, 1966

Tave Construction Co., Inc. v. Wiesenfeld

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Decided February 17, 1966 · Judges Sullivan, Lewis and Kolovsky

217 A.2d 140; 90 N.J. Super. 244 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

90 N.J. Super. 244 (1966)217 A.2d 140

TAVE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BENJAMIN WIESENFELD AND BESS WIESENFELD, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND FRANKLYN B. SPIEZLE AND WINDSOR CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 1, 1966.Decided February 17, 1966.

Before Judges SULLIVAN, LEWIS and KOLOVSKY.

Mr. Sidney M. Schreiber argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos, attorneys; Mr. Schreiber, of counsel; Mr. Gerald W. Conway, on the brief).

Mr. David L. Greene argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in Judge Leonard's opinion in the Chancery Division, reported at 82 N.J. Super. 562.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

Tave Construction Co., Inc. v. Wiesenfeld

Opinion

TAVE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,v.BENJAMIN WIESENFELD AND BESS WIESENFELD, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND FRANKLYN B. SPIEZLE AND WINDSOR CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

Before Judges SULLIVAN, LEWIS and KOLOVSKY.

PER CURIAM.

TAVE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BENJAMIN WIESENFELD AND BESS WIESENFELD, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND FRANKLYN B. SPIEZLE AND WINDSOR CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.