New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division, 1968

Nebel v. Nebel

Nebel v. Nebel
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Decided October 14, 1968 · Judges Goldmann, Kolovsky and Carton
247 A.2d 27; 103 N.J. Super. 216 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Nebel v. Nebel

Opinion

103 N.J. Super. 216 (1968)
247 A.2d 27

JEANNE D. NEBEL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT,
v.
ARTHUR J. NEBEL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 14, 1968.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KOLOVSKY and CARTON.

Mr. Colin M. Dillon argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Pollis, Williams, Pappas & Dillon, attorneys).

Mr. Harold G. Pierson argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Chancery Division order under appeal is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Wood, 99 N.J. Super. 256. The record provides substantial support for his findings and conclusions.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.