New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division, 1969

Schantz v. Rachlin

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Decided January 15, 1969 · Judges Sullivan, Foley and Lewis

249 A.2d 18; 104 N.J. Super. 154; 1969 N.J. Super. LEXIS 562 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

104 N.J. Super. 154 (1969)249 A.2d 18

NORMAN SCHANTZ AND SANDRA SCHANTZ, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, JOHN T. BROCKWELL AND ABBIE BROCKWELL, PLAINTIFFS - INTERVENORS - APPELLANTS,
v.
EDGAR L. RACHLIN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 6, 1969.Decided January 15, 1969.

Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEWIS.

Mr. Philip J. Blanda, Jr., argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Blanda and Blanda, attorneys).

Mr. Albert G. Besser argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Hannoch, Weisman, Stern & Besser, attorneys; Mr. Bruce Lubitz, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by Judge Lane in his opinion, reported at 101 N.J. Super. 334 (Ch. Div. 1968).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

Schantz v. Rachlin

Opinion

NORMAN SCHANTZ AND SANDRA SCHANTZ, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, JOHN T. BROCKWELL AND ABBIE BROCKWELL, PLAINTIFFS - INTERVENORS - APPELLANTS,v.EDGAR L. RACHLIN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEWIS.

PER CURIAM.

NORMAN SCHANTZ AND SANDRA SCHANTZ, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, JOHN T. BROCKWELL AND ABBIE BROCKWELL, PLAINTIFFS - INTERVENORS - APPELLANTS,
v.
EDGAR L. RACHLIN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.