Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division, 1969

Ruvoldt v. Tumulty

Ruvoldt v. Tumulty
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Decided October 22, 1969 · Judges, Goldmann, Lewis and Matthews
259 A.2d 465; 107 N.J. Super. 494 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Ruvoldt v. Tumulty

Opinion

107 N.J. Super. 494 (1969)
259 A.2d 465

HAROLD J. RUVOLDT, AND HAROLD J. RUVOLDT, JR., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
JAMES A. TUMULTY, JR., PROSECUTOR OF HUDSON COUNTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 20, 1969.
Decided October 22, 1969.

Before Judges, GOLDMANN, LEWIS and MATTHEWS.

Mr. Gregory J. Castano, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. James A. Tumulty, Jr., Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney pro se).

Mr. Harold J. Ruvoldt, Jr. argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Ruvoldt & Ruvoldt, attorneys pro se.

Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, filed a statement in lieu of brief (Mr. Kenneth M. Olex, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

This matter has been heard on an accelerated basis at the request of the parties.

We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the oral opinion of Assignment Judge Artaserse. 107 N.J. Super. 545. Costs to plaintiffs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑