Flemming v. RONSON CORPORATION
Flemming v. RONSON CORPORATION
275 A.2d 759; 114 N.J. Super. 221
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Flemming v. RONSON CORPORATION
Opinion
C.P. FLEMMING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
RONSON CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges LEWIS, MATTHEWS and MINTZ.
*222 Mr. Harry Heher, Jr. argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Lewis H. Eslinger of the New York Bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Weinberg and Manoff, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Seidman in his reported opinion, 107 N.J. Super. 311.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.