Fantasia v. HESS OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Fantasia v. HESS OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION
273 A.2d 402; 113 N.J. Super. 229
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Fantasia v. HESS OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Opinion
LARAINE FANTASIA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
HESS OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, NOW HESS OIL & CHEMICAL DIV., AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, LEONARD and MOUNTAIN.
Mr. John M. Strichek argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Waters & McPherson, attorneys).
Mr. James A. Robottom argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Haskins, Robottom & Hack, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the opinion of County Judge Arnold, reported at 110 N.J. Super. 360 (1970).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.