Conti Causeway Ford v. Jarossy

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division March 15, 1972

Conti Causeway Ford v. Jarossy, 288 A.2d 872 (1972)

118 N.J. Super. 521

Judges Lewis, Halpern and Lora

Opinion

118 N.J. Super. 521 (1972)288 A.2d 872

CONTI CAUSEWAY FORD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
NORMA JAROSSY AND STEPHEN JAROSSY, DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF TOMS RIVER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 7, 1972.Decided March 15, 1972.

Mr. Denis J. Corbett, Staff Attorney, Ocean County Legal Services, Inc., argued the cause for appellants Norma Jarossy and Stephen Jarossy.

*522 Mr. Robert S. Fisher, argued the cause for respondent The First National Bank of Toms River.

Mr. Eugene Jume, filed statement in lieu of brief for respondent Conti Causeway Ford.

Before Judges LEWIS, HALPERN and LORA.

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the issues raised by appellants in the light of the circumstances of this case, and conclude the judgment should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in Judge Robert H. Doherty, Jr.'s opinion below.

Reference

Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published

Conti Causeway Ford v. Jarossy

Opinion

CONTI CAUSEWAY FORD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,v.NORMA JAROSSY AND STEPHEN JAROSSY, DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,v.THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF TOMS RIVER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

Reference

CONTI CAUSEWAY FORD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
NORMA JAROSSY AND STEPHEN JAROSSY, DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF TOMS RIVER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.