State v. Saunders

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division June 21, 1976

State v. Saunders, 361 A.2d 111 (1976)

142 N.J. Super. 287

Judges Kole, Ard and Collester

Opinion

142 N.J. Super. 287 (1976)361 A.2d 111

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CHARLES SAUNDERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 14, 1976.Decided June 21, 1976.

Before Judges KOLE, ARD and COLLESTER.

*288 Mr. Alan Silber argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney; Mr. Robert A. Baime, of counsel).

Mr. Roy B. Greenman, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Prosecutor of Essex County, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The conviction of defendant is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Bedford. Cf. Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney for City of Richmond, D.C., 403 F. Supp. 1199, aff'd ___ U.S. ___, 96 S.Ct. 1489, 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976).

Affirmed.

Reference

Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published

State v. Saunders

Opinion

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,v.CHARLES SAUNDERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

Reference

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CHARLES SAUNDERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.