68th Street Apts., Inc. v. Lauricella

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division May 13, 1977

68th Street Apts., Inc. v. Lauricella, 374 A.2d 1222 (1977)

150 N.J. Super. 47

Judges Lynch, Milmed and Antell

Opinion

150 N.J. Super. 47 (1977)374 A.2d 1222

68TH STREET APTS., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CASIMIRO LAURICELLA, D/B/A CASS ELECTRIC CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. CASIMIRO LAURICELLA, D/B/A CASS ELECTRIC CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
INTROCASO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. AND RALPH L. INTROCASO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 26, 1977.Decided May 13, 1977.

Before Judges LYNCH, MILMED and ANTELL.

Mr. Antranig Aslanian, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Gigante & Aslanian, attorneys).

Mr. Howard M. Nashel argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Platoff, Heftler, Harker & Nashel, attorneys).

*48 PER CURIAM.

The portions of the order for judgment under review are affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Gaulkin in his opinion reported at 142 N.J. Super. 546 (Law Div. 1976).

Reference

Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published

68th Street Apts., Inc. v. Lauricella

Opinion

68TH STREET APTS., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,v.CASIMIRO LAURICELLA, D/B/A CASS ELECTRIC CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. CASIMIRO LAURICELLA, D/B/A CASS ELECTRIC CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,v.INTROCASO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. AND RALPH L. INTROCASO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Reference