Penthouse International Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Penthouse International Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 184 N.J. Super. 130 (1982)
445 A.2d 428; 1982 N.J. Super. LEXIS 761

Penthouse International Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Lester in his opinion which is reported in 179 N.J.Super. 155.

Absent proof that the process of defendant is akin to a monopoly or constitutes by analogy a public utility, we agree that defendant may assert the conditions here involved when accepting film for processing.

Reference

Full Case Name
PENTHOUSE INTERNATIONAL LTD. v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published