New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division, 1983

Romanowski v. Brick Tp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Decided November 22, 1983 · Judges Ard, Morton I. Greenberg and Trautwein

469 A.2d 85; 192 N.J. Super. 79 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

192 N.J. Super. 79 (1983)469 A.2d 85

JEFFREY ROMANOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND ROBERT FORRESTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted September 19, 1983.Decided November 22, 1983.

Before Judges ARD, MORTON I. GREENBERG and TRAUTWEIN.

*80 Russo, Courtney & Foster, for appellant Township of Brick (Joseph L. Foster on the brief).

Shebell & Schibell, for respondent Jeffrey Romanowski (Raymond P. Shebell on the brief).

Novins, Farley, Grossman & York, for respondent Robert Forrester (Kenneth R. Pentony on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Havey in his opinion of February 8, 1982. 185 N.J. Super. 197 (Law Div. 1982).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

Romanowski v. Brick Tp.

Opinion

JEFFREY ROMANOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,v.TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND ROBERT FORRESTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,v.TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Before Judges ARD, MORTON I. GREENBERG and TRAUTWEIN.

PER CURIAM.

JEFFREY ROMANOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND ROBERT FORRESTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.