Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division, 1984

Miller Auto Leasing v. Weinstein

Miller Auto Leasing v. Weinstein
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Decided April 17, 1984 · Judges Bischoff, Petrella and Brody
473 A.2d 996; 193 N.J. Super. 328 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Miller Auto Leasing v. Weinstein

Opinion

193 N.J. Super. 328 (1984)
473 A.2d 996

MILLER AUTO LEASING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MARTIN S. WEINSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS LINCOLN HARDWARE & SUPPLY, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 2, 1984.
Decided April 17, 1984.

Before Judges BISCHOFF, PETRELLA and BRODY.

*329 Robert E. Bennett, argued the cause for appellant (Mark R. Silber, attorney; Robert E. Bennett on the brief).

John A. Sweeney argued the cause for respondent (Dietz, Allen & Sweeney, attorneys; John A. Sweeney on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Wells, reported at 189 N.J. Super. 543 (Law Div. 1983).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑