Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division, 1987

Southland Corp. v. Edison Tp.

Southland Corp. v. Edison Tp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Decided March 31, 1987 · Judges Gaulkin, Baime and Ashbey
531 A.2d 1361; 220 N.J. Super. 294 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Southland Corp. v. Edison Tp.

Opinion

220 N.J. Super. 294 (1987)
531 A.2d 1361

THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND ROSEANNE AMENDOLA, T/A MENLO PARK AMOCO, AMOCO OIL COMPANY & AMOCO CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON AND TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 17, 1987.
Decided March 31, 1987.

Before Judges GAULKIN, BAIME and ASHBEY.

Peter A. DeSarno argued the cause for appellants.

Lee M. Hymerling argued the cause for respondent The Southland Corporation (Archer & Greiner, attorneys; Lee M. Hymerling, John P. Hauch, Jr. and Christopher R. Gibson, on the brief).

Vincent D. Paragano argued the cause for respondents Roseanne Amendola, Amoco Oil Company and Amoco Corporation (Vincent D. Paragano and Fran J. Garb, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Keefe's opinion reported at 217 N.J. Super. 158 (Ch.Div. 1986).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑