Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division, 1987

Apollo v. Kim Anh Pham

Apollo v. Kim Anh Pham
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Decided December 11, 1987 · Judges Deighan, Havey and Muir
539 A.2d 1222; 224 N.J. Super. 89 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Apollo v. Kim Anh Pham

Opinion

224 N.J. Super. 89 (1987)
539 A.2d 1222

BENJAMIN APOLLO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
KIM ANH PHAM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 1, 1987.
Decided December 11, 1987.

Before Judges DEIGHAN, HAVEY and MUIR.

Edward J. Bowen argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent (Edward J. Bowen on the brief).

Robert C. Rivas argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant (Bergen County Legal Services, attorneys; Robert C. Rivas on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division denying a trial by jury is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Sorkow in his opinion reported at 192 N.J. Super. 427 (Ch.Div. 1983).

(The balance of the opinion which disposes of essentially factual issues in the same case decided by another judge is omitted from this publication.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑