Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division, 1991

State, Dept. of Environmental Protection v. Jt Baker Chemical Company

State, Dept. of Environmental Protection v. Jt Baker Chemical Company
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Decided February 21, 1991 · Judges Petrella, Bilder and Muir, Jr.
587 A.2d 279; 246 N.J. Super. 224 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

State, Dept. of Environmental Protection v. Jt Baker Chemical Company

Opinion

246 N.J. Super. 224 (1991)
587 A.2d 279

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
J.T. BAKER CHEMICAL COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT CROSS-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 4, 1991.
Decided February 21, 1991.

Before Judges PETRELLA, BILDER and MUIR, Jr.

Ronald P. Heksch, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent (Douglas S. Eakeley, Acting *225 Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Michael R. Clancy, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Ronald P. Heksch, on the brief).

Theodore L. Garrett, of the Washington, D.C. Bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant (Hannoch Weisman, attorneys; Theodore L. Garrett and Irvin M. Freilich, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed substantially for the reasons given in Judge Diana's opinion of April 28, 1989, reported at 234 N.J. Super. 234, 560 A.2d 739 (Ch.Div. 1989). We are satisfied his factual findings are supported by substantial credible evidence in the record. See Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474, 484, 323 A.2d 495 (1974).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑