Carr v. Burgess
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Carr v. Burgess, 264 N.J. Super. 10 (1993)
623 A.2d 1384; 1993 N.J. Super. LEXIS 140
Carr v. Burgess
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Epstein in his opinion reported at 264 N.J.Super. 191, 623 A.2d 1384 (Ch.Div. 1993). We are satisfied that the findings of fact are supported by substantial
Reference
- Full Case Name
- JOYCE CARR, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. ARTHUR W. BURGESS, OF THE ESTATE OF H. THOMAS CARR, BARBARA CARR, MICHAEL T. CARR, KATHLEEN P. CARR AND TIMOTHY F. CARR, AND BERLY INVESTMENT CO. LESLIE GRABOWSKI, JEFFREY KIRSCH, ROBERT ELKINS, RAYMOND BUCK AND AQUAMARINE DEVELOPMENT, INC., INTERVENORS
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published