New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division, 1994

DeMarco v. DeMarco

DeMarco v. DeMarco
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Decided May 13, 1994
274 N.J. Super. 210; 643 A.2d 1029; 1994 N.J. Super. LEXIS 258

DeMarco v. DeMarco

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment of the Law Division dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Josephine DeMarco against her mother defendant Mary DeMarco is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Winkelstein in his written opinion of November 10, 1992 reported at 274 N.J.Super. 257, 643 A.2d 1053 (Law Div.). We are satisfied from our study of the record and the arguments presented that defendant is shielded by parental immunity. See Foldi v. Jeffries, 93 N.J. 533, 551, 461 A.2d 1145 (1983). We are also satisfied that summary judgment was the appropriate procedure to be employed. Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield, 17 N.J. 67, 73-75, 110 A.2d 24 (1954). All of the issues of law raised are clearly without merit. R. 2:ll-3(e)(l)(E).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.