New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division, 2021

CRANFORD DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC VS. TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD (L-3759-08, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

CRANFORD DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC VS. TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD (L-3759-08, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Decided January 12, 2021
CRANFORD DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC VS. TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD (L-3759-08, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2812-18T2 CRANFORD DEVELOPMENT

ASSOCIATES, LLC; SAMUEL

HEKEMIAN; PETER HEKEMIAN;

JEFFREY HEKEMIAN; AND

ANN KRIKORIAN As Trustee

For RICHARD HEKEMIAN And

MARK HEKEMIAN,

Plaintiffs-Respondents, v.

TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD;

MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE

TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD; AND

THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE

TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD,

Defendants-Appellants, and

HARTZ MOUNTAIN

INDUSTRIES, INC; H-CRANFORD

CONDUIT, LP; AND H-CRANFORD

CREDIT, LP,

Respondents. ________________________________ Submitted September 23, 2020 – Decided January 12, 2021 Before Judges Fuentes, Whipple and Rose.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, Docket No. L-3759-08.

Jeffrey R. Surenian and Associates, LLC, attorneys for appellants (Jeffrey R. Surenian, of counsel and on the briefs; Michael A. Jedziniak, on the briefs).

Hill Wallack, LLP, attorneys for respondents (Thomas F. Carroll, III, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

We have been advised this matter has been amicably adjusted, and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

A-2812-18T2

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.