New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division, 2024

Paul Amato v. Borough of Avon-By-The-Sea Planning Board

Paul Amato v. Borough of Avon-By-The-Sea Planning Board
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Decided August 1, 2024

Paul Amato v. Borough of Avon-By-The-Sea Planning Board

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3167-21 PAUL AMATO, JOYCE AMATO and CMM CONSTRUCTION, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. BOROUGH OF AVON-BY-THE- SEA PLANNING BOARD, BOROUGH OF AVON-BY-THE- SEA and COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, Defendants-Respondents, and ROBERT McGOVERN, CORINNE McGOVERN and HOWARD HARDIE, Defendants/Intervernors-Respondents. ____________________________________ Argued March 14, 2023 – Decided August 1, 2024 Before Judges Sumners and Susswein.

On appeal from an interlocutory order of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Monmouth County, Docket No. L-3884-19.

Timothy B. Middleton and Jeff Thakker, attorneys for appellants (Jeff Thakker, of counsel; Timothy B.

Middleton, on the briefs).

Mark Kitrick, attorney for respondents Avon-By-The- Sea (King, Kitrick, Jackson, McWeeney & Wells, attorneys; Mark Kitrick, of counsel and on the brief).

Craig M. Gianetti, attorney for respondent Howard Hardie (Day Pitney LLP, attorneys; Craig M. Gianetti, of counsel and on the brief; Amanda M. Kronemeyer, on the brief).

Gary T. Hall, attorney for respondents Robert & Corinne McGovern (McCarter & English, LLP, attorneys; Gary T. Hall, of counsel and on the brief).

PER CURIAM The parties having resolved their differences, the within appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

A-3167-21

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.